{"id":169,"date":"2009-03-09T21:22:38","date_gmt":"2009-03-09T20:22:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/?p=169"},"modified":"2009-03-10T00:25:55","modified_gmt":"2009-03-09T23:25:55","slug":"what-went-wrong-an-anthropologist%e2%80%99s-point-of-view","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/2009\/03\/09\/what-went-wrong-an-anthropologist%e2%80%99s-point-of-view\/","title":{"rendered":"What went wrong. An anthropologist\u2019s point of view."},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the communication I made on March 3rd to the Socialist members of the European Parliament in Brussels as my contribution to the one-day conference entitled “Closing the casino: building a fairer and stronger real economy”<\/b> <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Modern societies of European origin were historically built according to a tripartite structure composed of warriors-raiders, priests and commoners. By the time the new concept of democracy emerged, the land and the wealth buried in it had already been distributed by the warriors-raiders between themselves. Inheritance of property had contributed at strengthening this pattern. Bourgeois revolutions of the eighteen century condoned the addition of the power of money to that of strength only. From then on cash buttressed the power balance that the sword had first put into place. In the twentieth century, colonialism and paradoxically communism, ensured the full globalization of that order of European origin. Current appeals for \u201cleveling the playing field\u201d ignore the lack of evidence that the field was ever level. <\/p>\n

Stock options: the holy alliance between investors and company executives<\/strong><\/p>\n

In an infamous quote that Ben Stein had him concede for the New York Times, investor extraordinaire Warren Buffet stated: \u201cThere\u2019s class warfare, all right, but it\u2019s my class, the rich class, that\u2019s making war, and we\u2019re winning.\u201d This statement marked the return in common parlance of an outmoded way of speaking. Indeed, with the rise of the Chicago School, the phrase \u201cclass warfare\u201d got tabooed and the words \u201ccapitalists\u201d (aka \u201cinvestors\u201d), \u201cbosses\u201d (aka \u201ccompany executives\u201d) and \u201cworkers\u201d (\u201cemployees\u201d, \u201cassociates\u201d, \u201cteam members\u201d, etc.) removed from the economic literature and replaced by the catch-all notion of \u201cmonetary mass\u201d as part of a more general process where \u201cphysical forces\u201d replaced \u201cpeople\u201d in explanations of the economy. That didn\u2019t mean though that class warfare was over or had never taken place. The decisive and final move came in the late 1970s when McKinsey devised \u201cstock options\u201d by which the \u201cinterests of investors and company executives would henceforth be aligned.\u201d The plan succeeded beyond both parties\u2019 wildest dreams.<\/p>\n

The distribution of wealth: what happened to it<\/strong><\/p>\n

Prior to stock options, wage-earners were part of a triangular power game where investors and executives kept each other at bay. With the introduction of stock options, those days were over: a holy alliance was born to which wage-earners were no match. Predictably, their piece of the pie dwindled down. Any attempt they would make to increase their share would be brutally countered by central banks concerned with monetary masses and raising interest rates \u2013 that is: raising unemployment \u2013 forcing wage-earners to pipe down. <\/p>\n

With lower revenues, wage-earners were led to ever borrow more. Commercial banks graciously obliged. Meanwhile, companies had got in the habit of borrowing rather than reinvesting so that by now any money that anyone needed was borrowed. Interest payments were mushrooming, becoming a burdensome component of every price. \u201cCapital\u201d \u2013 being money you don\u2019t have but still need \u2013 kept concentrating in fewer and deepening pockets. The more capital is concentrated the less likely it is though that it happens to be where it is actually needed.<\/p>\n

Speculation: the ascent of the Speculative Society <\/strong><\/p>\n

What do you do then when you don\u2019t have the money you need and you know that working harder won\u2019t make much of a difference ? You buy a lottery ticket. By the end of the twentieth century everyone had come to that same conclusion and \u201cbubbles\u201d and growth had become synonymous notions.<\/p>\n

You buy stock but not for dividends which are boringly your share in the surplus the company has made through the stock you purchased, no: you buy stock for capital gains. To insure that this happens the stock exchange needs to be turned into a casino. The price of Total or BP stock needs to change every five seconds. Not that there is anything in the business of Total or BP justifying that the price of its stock changes every five seconds or for that matter even every five days. But it is needed for the stock market to be run as a casino where huge capital gains may materialize. When the scheme stops working, it crashes, which happens indeed every eighty years or so.<\/p>\n

Hunger riots stirred by museums and hospitals<\/strong><\/p>\n

If only people who have wheat to deliver or to take delivery of were trading wheat the price of that cereal would be determined by how much of it gets produced and how much is needed: what is commonly called supply and demand. But this is not how things work nowadays: the price of wheat gets determined by bets made by big institutional investors such as pension funds, university endowments, hospitals and museums. A reasonable social expectation is that they would focus on offering pensioners annuities, teaching pupils, curing patients or displaying art, but they are not: they are heavily busy pushing the price of wheat up or down with the goal of protecting their assets and no concern whether anybody would live or die as a consequence of their speculation.<\/p>\n

Spot and futures markets allow those exposed to an actual risk (due to the weather, the economic environment, etc.) to cover their positions, hence reducing overall risk. Speculative \u201cnaked\u201d positions on the contrary artificially create risk where there was none. Coverage provides an insurance while \u201cnaked\u201d positions are risk-generating bets. Insurance protects the economy while bets kill it and measures should be taken accordingly. The means for banning betting on the fluctuation of prices are simple: they are spelled out in FASB 133, a rule issued by the American Financial Association Standards Board that establishes a fiscal differential treatment for coverage and naked positions. FASB 133 should be upgraded to a badly needed and clear-cut prohibition. <\/p>\n

Recommendations<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Break the unholy alliance between investors and company executives: the social fabric is being damaged as we speak. Ban stock options<\/b>. <\/p>\n

2. Free central bankers from monetarism<\/b>: societies are not made of monetary masses but of people. Central banks have a more crucial role to play than systematically siding with investors and company executives against wage-earners. <\/p>\n

3. Apply urgently appropriate fiscal policy<\/b> so that the chances increase that capital happens to be where it is actually needed. <\/p>\n

4. Close down the casino: stop continuous pricing on the spot and future markets<\/b>.<\/p>\n

5. Bar speculators from commodities\u2019 markets<\/b>: bar \u201cnon-commercials.\u201d Let them focus on what they do best: teach pupils, cure patients and display art for the enjoyment and education of the public. <\/p>\n

6. Encourage insurance but ban bets on the fluctuation of prices<\/b>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\n

Here is the communication I made on March 3rd to the Socialist members of the European Parliament in Brussels as my contribution to the one-day conference entitled “Closing the casino: building a fairer and stronger real economy”<\/b> <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Modern societies of European origin were historically built according to a tripartite structure composed of warriors-raiders, priests […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4,5,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anthropology","category-economy","category-finance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=169"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":173,"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169\/revisions\/173"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}