{"id":479,"date":"2012-03-13T08:35:10","date_gmt":"2012-03-13T07:35:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/?p=479"},"modified":"2012-03-13T08:49:53","modified_gmt":"2012-03-13T07:49:53","slug":"no-matter-what-we-do-it-will-be-still-the-same","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/2012\/03\/13\/no-matter-what-we-do-it-will-be-still-the-same\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cNo Matter What We Do, It Will Still Be The Same\u201d<\/b>"},"content":{"rendered":"

An English translation by Bernard Bouvet of my \u00ab QUOI QU\u2019ON FASSE, CE SERA LA M\u00caME CHOSE ! \u00bb<\/a> of March 11.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n

77% of you, my dear blog readers, not all of you, but a \u201ccomfortable majority\u201d of you, happens to be French. Your country is now in full \u201celection showbiz\u201d mode, and the mainstream media, in the press, on the radio, on television, are full of it, news on why the moment is \u201ccrucial\u201d and \u201chow to vote\u201d, are front and centre.<\/p>\n

Still, you are perfectly conscious of the fact that whatever which way you vote, either for one of the two candidates facing each other in the second round, or someone else, as a protest vote favouring either the extreme-left or the extreme-right, or a blank vote, or even if you don\u2019t bother voting, all that is of no importance since the result will be the same: either actively or passively, you will elect or help elect a candidate who will either immediately set out to carry out the program of any such \u201ctroika\u201d (EU, IMF, ECB) forgetful of the meaning of \u201cdemocracy\u201d – if it ever understood it – or a candidate who will, after a perfunctory six month delay, carry out the exact same program, in \u201cformer president Miterrand\u2019s fashion\u201d, following a \u201cvaliant\u201d last stand.<\/p>\n

No doubt, that last stand will turn out to be \u201cvaliant\u201d, but again, a fat lot of good it\u2019ll do you.<\/p>\n

One can sense the weariness, the discouragement pervading your comments on this blog since the election campaign started.<\/p>\n

Throughout history, particularly in the 19th century, that kind of hopelessness had led to several social change attempts from within the system. For instance, it gave birth to an array of communal groups, rendered vulnerable from the very start, to some extent, by an exaggeratedly idyllic view of human nature, but mostly due to the hostility of an outside world, a world which had stood unchanged. How many a grandiose project of a cooperative, of a social workshop, of abolishing money, of an alternative currency, did not succumb to the assaults of those from the outside who had retained their, let\u2019s call it… \u201cbusiness sense\u201d? Virtue, as Saint-Just realised far too late, can only be exercised within a protective institutional framework, otherwise, it is purely and simply trampled under foot.<\/p>\n

What to do? Those unanswered questions require resolving, if the goal for a preferred tomorrow is to achieve a decent, livable world. A world where, in retrospect and in contrast, we will realise what a nightmare the previous world had been that we contended ourselves with.<\/p>\n

Indeed, those 19th-century associationists, collectivists, socialists, communists, anarchists, even enlightened liberals such as Saint-Simon and Auguste Comte, posed those unanswered questions, but still, they remained unresolved. The 20th century, for its part, has had its share of false solutions ending in atrocities.<\/p>\n

In France, the Revolution of 1848 gave birth to numerous projects founded on generosity but soon failing, due to the instigators\u2019 lack of a proper analysis of principles. Proudhon laments the \u201cpremature birth\u201d of the Revolution. But aren\u2019t all revolutions always, and by definition, born prematurely, otherwise they wouldn\u2019t even have been considered as necessary. The excuse has been abused throughout human history, of having been caught unprepared in the face of an \u201cunpredictable\u201d collapse, even if predicted with some accuracy by a few.<\/p>\n

Last Sunday, I launched a five-part series called: \u201cThe Remaining Unresolved Questions\u201d. I have only been back home last night, following a series of speeches in Belgium and Holland, with no time yet to read your contributions to the debate, but I am readying myself to do so.<\/p>\n

Anyway, those \u201cRemaining Unresolved Questions\u201d are already well-known. What I am expecting of you, is for a few (the rest of the troops fill follow suit in no time) to initiate an undertaking of resolving those questions. A precise list will take shape along the way, but in the meantime a few questions can be clearly formulated: \u201cHow do we smash the wealth-concentrating machinery?\u201d. \u201cHow do we terminate speculation?\u201c. \u201cHow should newly created wealth be redistributed?\u201d. \u201cHow do we re-invent an economic system neither based on private property, nor on \u201cgrowth\u201d, both recognised as life destroying on our planet?\u201d. \u201cHow do we eliminate work, without reducing to misery those who lived from it?\u201d. Etc. Etc.<\/p>\n

Time has come to define in new terms this insane world that – because of weariness and because of discouragement – we have contented ourselves with until now.<\/p>\n

So, have a nice day, get set, ready, go! Use your pens, emails, phone calls, your arms, your legs… whatever works!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\n

An English translation by Bernard Bouvet of my \u00ab QUOI QU\u2019ON FASSE, CE SERA LA M\u00caME CHOSE ! \u00bb<\/a> of March 11.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n

77% of you, my dear blog readers, not all of you, but a \u201ccomfortable majority\u201d of you, happens to be French. Your country is now in full \u201celection showbiz\u201d mode, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14,5,7,16,12],"tags":[79,78,74,81,26,80],"class_list":["post-479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecology","category-economy","category-essential-questions","category-history","category-human-complex-systems","tag-french-presidential-elections","tag-private-property","tag-proudhon","tag-redistribution","tag-speculation","tag-wealth"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=479"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/479\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":485,"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/479\/revisions\/485"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pauljorion.com\/blog_en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}