Well! It is comments such as yours that make the trip … worthy of the trouble! 😀
Illustration by DALL·E (+PJ)
P.J.:
Great! I’m totally reassured about your grasping the emergent process. Now, you must have noticed that while the growth of the original graph is fully transparent to human beings (you add a new word attached as a label to a
Illustration by DALL·E (+PJ)
P.J.:
Ok. If that’s clear to you, you will be acquired to the idea that when new information is provided for graph build-up, it shouldn’t be through reversing to the original graph (which would entail loss of information) but through
Illustration by DALL·E (+PJ)
P.J.:
Ok, if it seems plausible to you that there are emergent phenomena when transposing from the original graph to its dual, how would you explain that there is a gain in information in the process (a gain
Illustration by DALL·E (+PJ)
At the time (1987-90) when I was developing software for British Telecom called ANELLA (Associative Network with Emergent Logical and Learning Abilities), it was the colleague who had coined this nice acronym who had drawn my attention to emergence phenomena in
Illustration by DALL·E from the text.
Last month (from 6 to 9 April), I offered here a series of 6 posts where I quadrilogued with GPT-4 and a duplicated version of Claude 3 about the P vs NP conjecture, a classic theoretical
Illustration by DALL·E from the text
Listening to many speakers on AI, I’ve noticed that the word “evolution”—which constantly filled our ears over the recent decades—is rarely used by those involved in using or creating AI technologies. Of course, Ray Kurzweil uses the word, and
Some evidence from my own experience
Transcript:
What evidence is there that the singularity has taken place?
I was wondering, in recent months, how would
© Gregory Van Gansen/Imagetting
Paul Jorion: “With AI, we have invented a machine that is more intelligent than we are”.
By Samuel Ribot / ALP
March 30th 2024
Paul Jorion, an anthropologist, economist, psychoanalyst and artificial intelligence researcher, writes
Illustration by DALL·E (+PJ)
After submitting to GPT-4 the questions we had debated, Claude 3, split into “Claude 1” and “Claude 2”, and I, I thought it would be a good idea for me to let them know their colleague’s assessment to see if it
Well! It is comments such as yours that make the trip … worthy of the trouble! 😀
When I saw your work on P vs NP, I knew you were on to something profound. I couldn’t have…
Admittedly, I was a little thrown off by the direction this took. From my perspective, you (1) identified the major…
It’s wonderful seeing you at work with AI to formalize the synthesis of the insights you had so many years…
I solved it! Paradox! The epistemic barrier was always in Paradox. Maintain truth as ambiguous (Both true OR false) until…
This article goes along with what I was writing. It turns out it was published one day earlier than my…
LLMs deal essentially with language but seems amenable to graphics as well. To such an extent that one may wonder…
“the marvellous powers of the brain emerge not from any single, uniformly structured connectionist network but from highly evolved arrangements…
When the entangled narrative is based on the Bible, the problem is the Bible.
I intend to read the Krichmar paper, thanks for mentioning it. I looked in my library, I’ve got a 1987…
"L'avènement de la Singularité" "Thought as Word Dynamics" ANELLA A NEW "US" FOR NEW TIMES Angela Merkel Aristotle Artificial Intelligence balanced budget rule Barclays Brexit capitalism Chair "Stewardship of Finance" Claude 3 consciousness debt Donald Trump ECB EFSF ESM Europe eurozone France Germany GPT-4 Greece Herman Van Rompuy IMF Italy Jean-Claude Juncker José Manuel Barroso Large Language Models LIBOR linguistics LLM Mario Draghi Memory Pribor.io problem solving Proudhon P vs NP Spain speculation thalamus The Singularity United States