Hello Paul and all of us !
I’ll print this document and read in my garden ..for my personal information
I’m living in » the North » ( where there are bears .. hi .. HI .. )
Have a nice week end
Best regards !
Joan
Mr Jorion, may I, remind you that it’s the refusal of the European Constitutional Treaty that occurred in 2005 . The Lisbon Treaty was imposed later due to the Sarkozy’s activism, after that the latter had become president of France, and with the complicity of the Socialist Party (during the ratification of that treaty, by the Versailles congress convened for this purpose).
An early version of the ECT that I got at that time (via Internet), was starting with this sentence attributed to Thucydides: « Our Constitution is called a democracy because the power is in the hands, not of the few but of the many « . http://www.liberaux.org/lofiversion/index.php?t12045.html
The text found at the previous link, suggests that the European project, was even
less democratic, than the project of the founding fathers of the Great American Republic.
Later I bought the final version of the ECT in a bookstore: This sentence was missing !
For the oligarchy people this was an implicit admission , that they had no intention of establishing a democracy of citizens, but the reign of an aristocracy of merchants over a population of alienated and mindless consumers. Again the Hamiltonians had triumphed.
It is therefore not really strange that although separated by more than 200 years, these two attempts to create a Union of Merchant States, finally are – body and soul – engulfed by an economic crisis, but even more of values ​​and identity.
We live in what should be called « Democratorship of representation ». Representation in the meaning of show, strass and glitter and democratorship not to say dictatorship, this neologism was introduced by someone whose I forgot the name.
Pascalou Metoo et les Fémens et bien sûr toutes nos soeurs du Royava et d’ailleurs te remercie d’avoir évoqué pour…
Thomas Oui mais que veux tu qu’on fasse : une pétition? » Nous exigeons que Ruiz colle des émoticons quand…
J.M.B Les « points à nuancer » sont pertinents et la conclusion idem. C’est plus que pas mal, il me semble…. Pour…
Ruiz désolé c’est encore moi, mais, Si c’est de l’humour, c’est assez visqueux et pas drôle, Si ça n’en est…
@ilicitano Ces chiffres sont très clairs U.E. et USA population de taille analogues, mais PIB dans un rapport proche de…
@Pascal 17 ans c’était le bon age pour la confier à une formatrice tierce expérimentée afin de lui permettre une…
@Grand-mère Michelle l’État d’israël tel qu’il est actuellement démocratiquement gouverné est le résultat de la dynamique sioniste élaborée dans l’Europe…
@alvin Mais la situation n’est sans doute pas aussi grave que celle qui avait incité BHL à faire l’assaut du…
Suite : Voici une réponse précise, rigoureuse et neutre à votre question : quels protocoles expérimentaux rigoureux permettraient de tester…
L’analyse de Copilot : « Voici une analyse rigoureuse, neutre et structurée du texte que vous avez partagé, en respectant vos…
En poursuivant votre navigation sur ce site, vous acceptez l’utilisation de cookies permettant de conserver vos préférences, d'établir des statistiques et d'afficher des contenus tiers (par exemple, des vidéos YouTube).
5 réponses à “HISTORY’S LESSONS”
Hello Paul and all of us !
I’ll print this document and read in my garden ..for my personal information
I’m living in » the North » ( where there are bears .. hi .. HI .. )
Have a nice week end
Best regards !
Mr Jorion, may I, remind you that it’s the refusal of the European Constitutional Treaty that occurred in 2005 . The Lisbon Treaty was imposed later due to the Sarkozy’s activism, after that the latter had become president of France, and with the complicity of the Socialist Party (during the ratification of that treaty, by the Versailles congress convened for this purpose).
An early version of the ECT that I got at that time (via Internet), was starting with this sentence attributed to Thucydides:
« Our Constitution is called a democracy because the power is in the hands, not of the few but of the many « .
http://www.liberaux.org/lofiversion/index.php?t12045.html
The text found at the previous link, suggests that the European project, was even
less democratic, than the project of the founding fathers of the Great American Republic.
Later I bought the final version of the ECT in a bookstore: This sentence was missing !
For the oligarchy people this was an implicit admission , that they had no intention of establishing a democracy of citizens, but the reign of an aristocracy of merchants over a population of alienated and mindless consumers. Again the Hamiltonians had triumphed.
It is therefore not really strange that although separated by more than 200 years, these two attempts to create a Union of Merchant States, finally are – body and soul – engulfed by an economic crisis, but even more of values ​​and identity.
We live in what should be called « Democratorship of representation ». Representation in the meaning of show, strass and glitter and democratorship not to say dictatorship, this neologism was introduced by someone whose I forgot the name.
Correct: I will make a modification.
I apologize, but the following link:
http://www.liberaux.org/lofiversion/index.php?t12045.html
doesn’t point anymore at the text that could be read at this address before.
Now you arrive on the site’s welcome page…
You can find the original version of the ECT of which I have been talking about at the following address:
http://www.geopolitis.net/LES%20DOCUMENTS/LA%20CONVENTION%20EUROPEENNE.pdf